Imaging
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Imaging (2007) 19, 249-268
© 2007 The British Institute of Radiology
doi: 10.1259/imaging/26146719
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ostlere, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ostlere, S


Papers

Imaging the knee

S Ostlere, FRCR

Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre and Oxford Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK

Imaging plays a major role in the management of knee disorders. In acute trauma with suspected internal derangement, MRI is an excellent technique for differentiating cases of true locking requiring arthroscopy from non-surgical cases. MRI is nearly always diagnostic for acute patellar dislocation. In chronic knee disorders, MRI is also shown to be sensitive and specific for a wide range of meniscal, ligamentous, bony and synovial pathologies. Plain films are rarely needed in addition to MRI, and should be generally reserved for suspected osteoarthritis and acute bony trauma. Ultrasound is a useful and cheap first-line investigation for soft-tissue masses and tendon pathology. Imaging, including MRI dynamic studies, is useful in the assessment of the common problem of anterior knee pain. In the post-operative knee, MRI is still useful but less accurate. MR arthrography and CT arthrography are useful for assessing the post-surgical meniscus.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
BJR DMFR IMAGING ALL BIR JOURNALS
Copyright © 2007 by the British Institute of Radiology.